Brief Therapy Advocates Attempting to Change a Family System Rather Than Helping
| STRATEGIC MODELS 271 | |
| C 50 I N I C A L N O T E | |
| Relabeling works best when there is an attribute of | abroad so the two of y'all volition have a neater abode to |
| truth in the directive. Thus, "What you call your married woman'southward | enjoy." |
| nagging is merely her wishing to have things put |
Another class of therapeutic double bind, relabeling (essentially changing the label attached to a person or problem from negative to positive) attempts to change the meaning of a situation by altering its conceptual and/or emotional context in such a manner that the unabridged state of affairs is perceived differently. That is, language is used to modify the interpretation of what has occurred, and thus invites the possibility of a new response to the behavior. The situation remains unchanged; but the meaning attributed to information technology, and thus its consequences, are altered.
The classic instance comes from Mark Twain's Tom Sawyer, who relabeled as pleasurable the drudgery of whitewashing a fence and thus was in a position to ask other boys to pay for the privilege of helping him. Relabeling typically emphasizes the positive ("Mother's not existence overprotective; she merely is trying to be helpful") and helps the family redefine disturbing behavior in more sympathetic or optimistic terms. Relabeling provides a new framework for looking at interaction; every bit the rules by which the family operates become more than explicit, the family members become aware that old patterns are not necessarily unchangeable. The goal of relabeling, similar that of the other therapeutic double-demark techniques, is to change the structure of family relationships and interactions.
MRI BRIEF FAMILY THERAPY
Cursory therapy calls for finding culling ways of facilitating benign changes that are relatively quick and inexpensive, and that are especially suited at symptomatic junctures in the life wheel of individuals and families (Peake, Borduin, & Archer, 1988). Typically they are active, highly focused, short-term methods that try to enable the family system to mobilize its underutilized resources to solve or resolve the problem(s) that led them to seek help.
The MRI version of brief therapy focuses on resolving bug that outcome from prior attempts to solve an ordinary difficulty. Later identifying the family's more-of- the-same solutions that prolong the problem, the MRI brief therapist tries to detect the family unit rules and communication sequences that maintain and perpetuate the problem. Interventions and so are directed rather specifically at changing the rules that sustain the problem the family wants fixed. Once the problem is eliminated, the therapist'south chore is completed; no try is made to seek further changes, unless requested by the family. The focus of all clinical interventions at the Cursory Therapy Center is on solving specific problems and/or reducing presenting symptoms, rather than seeking changes in the overall family system. If client families modify what they are doing to solve a trouble, then changes in the presenting problem can be achieved, since it is assumed that their attempted solutions are feeding the problem and thus perpetuating it (Schlanger & Anger-Diaz, 1999). Thus information technology tin can be said that the focus is on treating the solution, not treating the problem.
272 Chapter ELEVEN
Brief family therapy as adept at the MRI3 is a time-limited (usually no more than 10 sessions), businesslike, non-historical, step-by-step strategic arroyo based on the notion that near human problems develop through the mishandling of normal difficulties in life. In the MRI view, the attempted "solutions" imposed past families get the problem, equally people persist in maintaining cocky-defeating "more of the same"attempts at problem resolution. Thus, from the MRI behavioral perspective, the customer's complaint is the problem, not a symptom of an underlying disorder, as more than psychodynamic approaches might conjecture.
Put in more than graphic interpersonal terms, the client is like a person caught in quicksand, grabbing onto someone else: The more he or she struggles, the more than likely he or she is to sink and pull others in; the more he or she sinks, the more than the struggling escalates and the more others are caught in the quicksand. In other words, ineffective attempts persist, and now the "solution" itself but makes matters worse. According to advocates of this approach, information technology is but by giving up solutions that perpetuate the problem and attempting new solutions that are different in kind that changes can occur in the self-perpetuating behavior.
The time limitations of this arroyo force clients to specifically define their current problem ("Nosotros believe our teenage boy is using drugs") rather than speak in generalities ("We're having family unit problems"). Here the therapist is interested in how, exactly, this problem affects every participant'due south life, and why they are seeking assist merely now (rather than earlier or later).
The strategically oriented brief therapist tries to obtain a clear movie of the specific problem every bit well equally the current interactive beliefs that maintains it, and so devises a plan for changing those aspects of the organisation that perpetuate the problem (Segal, 1987). By restraining people from repeating former unworkable solutions (and by altering the arrangement to promote change), the therapist can assistance them break out of their subversive or dysfunctional bicycle of beliefs.
Brief therapy advocates argue that most therapists, in attempting to help a distressed person, encourage that person to do the opposite of what he or she has been doing—an insomniac to fall asleep, a depressed person to cheer up, a withdrawn person to brand friends. These approaches, by emphasizing opposites or negative feedback, just atomic number 82 to internal reshuffling; they practise not alter the system. Watzlawick and assembly (1974) call such moves superficial first-gild changes, effecting change within the existing system without changing the structure of the organization itself. Real change, however, necessitates an alteration of the organization itself; it calls for a second-order change to make the organization operate in a different manner. Outset-social club changes, according to Watzlawick, Beavin, and Jackson (1967), are"games without end"; they are mistaken attempts at changing ordinary difficulties that eventually come up to a stalemate past continuing to force a solution despite available evidence that it is precisely what is non working (Bodin, 1981).
Three Types of Misguided Solutions
MRI therapists have this position on problem germination—that complaints typically presented to a therapist arise and endure because of the mishandling of those normal,
3Several cursory therapy approaches currently be side by side, no dubiety stimulated in role by the restrictive reimbursement practices instituted past managed care companies. Consequently, many agencies set up limits on the number of sessions provided. In Chapter 14 we dissimilarity the MRI problem-focused approach with that of the Cursory Family Therapy Center in Milwaukee's solution-focused effort.
STRATEGIC MODELS 273
everyday difficulties occurring in all of our lives. Repeatedly employing unsatisfactory solutions just produces new problems, which then may increment in severity and begin to obscure the original difficulty. From the MRI perspective, at that place are three ways in which a family mishandles solutions so that they pb to bigger problems: (a) some activity is necessary but non taken (for example, the family unit attempts a solution by denying in that location is a problem—the roof is non leaking, sister is not pregnant, money is no problem fifty-fifty though father has lost his job); (b) an action is taken when it is unnecessary (for instance, newlyweds split up before long after the wedding anniversary because their marriage is non as ideal equally each partner fantasized it would be); (c) action is taken at the wrong level (for case, marital conflicts or parent-child conflicts are dealt with by "mutual sense" or first-social club changes, such as each party like-minded to try harder next fourth dimension, when revisions in the family system—2d-order changes—are necessary). The third type is probably most mutual, since people with problems endeavor to deal with them in a style consequent with their existing frame of reference. Repeated failures only lead to bewilderment, frustration, and intensification of the same responses.
Paradoxical interventions, especially reframing, are emphasized in guild to redefine the family's frame of reference then that members conceptualize the problem differently and change their efforts to resolve it. As we saw in our earlier discussions of the structural approach to therapy, reframing involves a redefining process in which a state of affairs remains unchanged simply the significant attributed to information technology is revised then equally to permit a more than constructive outlook. Reframing allows the state of affairs to exist viewed differently and thus facilitates new responses to information technology. As linguistic communication changes about a trouble, changes in feelings are likely to follow.
MRI Brief Therapy in Action
As practiced at the MRI, brief therapy, presented to the clients as beingness of short-term duration, sets up a powerful expectation of change. At the same time, the therapists tend to "think small," to exist satisfied with minor merely progressive changes. They also urge their clients to "go wearisome" and to exist skeptical of dramatic, sudden progress; this restraining paradoxical technique is actually designed to promote rapid change as the family is provoked to prove the therapist wrong in his or her circumspection and pessimism. In general, the therapists practise non struggle with the client's resistance to change, neither confronting the family nor offering interpretations to which the members might react negatively or defensively. Cursory therapy aims to avoid ability struggles with the family while it reshapes the members' perspectives on electric current problems and on their previous attempts to overcome difficulties.
MRI brief therapists do not insist that all family members nourish sessions; they are content to deal just with those members motivated enough to practise so. An important aspect of their work is first to collect information on previously failed solutions so as not to repeat them. They then prepare specific goals of handling, formulating a case plan and implementing interventions whenever there is an opportunity to interrupt before repetitive attempted solutions that merely serve to perpetuate the problem (Segal, 1991).
The MRI brief therapy program is a squad effort. Although each family is assigned a primary therapist who conducts the interviews, other team members may watch from behind the ane-way mirror and phone the therapist with communication, feedback, and suggestions while treatment is in progress—all efforts directed at speeding upwards a change in family interactive patterns. In special cases (for example, a therapist-family
274 Affiliate ELEVEN
Text not available due to copyright restrictions
impasse) i of the team members may enter the room and address the primary therapist or the clients, perhaps siding with the client to increase the likelihood that forthcoming directives from the observer volition be implemented. Families are non screened prior to treatment and are taken into the programme on a first-come, first-served ground. Squad discussions precede and follow each session after the initial family contact. Telephone follow-ups, in which each family receiving treatment at the center is asked by a squad fellow member other than the principal therapist to evaluate change in the presenting problem, have place iii months and 12 months after the concluding interview.
The cybernetic nature of both problem germination and trouble resolution, with its recursive feedback loops and circular causality metaphors, is basic to MRI thinking and therapeutic endeavors. Ineffective solutions to everyday difficulties lead to symptomatic beliefs; in one case a family unit fellow member manifests a symptom, the family, believing it has the best way to deal with the trouble, responds past repeating the interactive beliefs that produced the symptom in the first place. The further repetition of poor solutions intensifies the original difficulty, equally the family clings to behavior patterns that are no longer functional or adaptive (Peake, Borduin, & Archer, 1988). Therapists,
Source: https://studfile.net/preview/4654252/page:36/
0 Response to "Brief Therapy Advocates Attempting to Change a Family System Rather Than Helping"
Post a Comment